Raghopur Assembly Seat Election Results 2025 LIVE

Candidate Name Result Total Votes Vote Percentage %
Tejashwi Prasad Yadav RJD Won 118597 49.74
Satish Kumar BJP Lost 104065 43.64
Baliram Singh IND Lost 3086 1.29
Chanchal Kumar JSP Lost 2399 1.01
Raju Kumar AAP Lost 1322 0.55
Baidyanath Kumar Sah IND Lost 1039 0.44
Anil Singh NCP Lost 983 0.41
Shilam Jha AHFB Lost 794 0.33
Prem Kumar JanshaktiJD Lost 709 0.30
Umesh Mahato RJbP Lost 454 0.19
Mohamad Rizwanul Azam JDR Lost 408 0.17
Ram Babu Ray JtAP Lost 360 0.15
Kavita Kumari BiharJP Lost 199 0.08

Raghopur Assembly Constituency Profile Assembly Election Result 2025 Live

Raghopur Assembly Constituency Profile

Located in Bihar's Vaishali district, Raghopur is a constituency known for its strong rural character, deep political roots, and influential electoral presence. Surrounded by the Ganga’s riverine belt, Raghopur reflects both the challenges and potential of Bihar’s agrarian heartland.

The constituency has gained prominence due to its association with notable political leaders and its role in shaping regional politics. With agriculture as the primary livelihood, local issues often revolve around flood management, road connectivity, irrigation, education, and healthcare accessibility.

Raghopur’s diverse demography, comprising farmers, labourers, small traders, and a strong presence of the younger generation, mirrors the aspirations of a region striving for improved infrastructure and sustainable development. The area’s geography brings both opportunities and recurring challenges, making development planning a key electoral priority.

As Bihar moves toward balanced growth, Raghopur stands as a constituency that embodies resilience, political significance, and the hope for long-term progress in rural Bihar.

Raghopur Assembly Seat Election Result

Candidate Name Result Total Votes Vote %
Tejashwi Prasad Yadav RJD Won 97404 49.85
Satish Kumar BJP Lost 59230 30.31
Rakesh Raushan LJSP Lost 24947 12.77
Rajeshwar Ray IND Lost 3481 1.78
Kumar Sameer Raja Yadav JAP(L) Lost 3413 1.75
Ramswaroop Ray IND Lost 2672 1.37
Raju Kumar IND Lost 1632 0.84
Meghnath Paswan IND Lost 557 0.29
Rajesh Raushan BMPk Lost 449 0.23
Madhusudhan Paswan IND Lost 407 0.21
Nathu Bhagat IND Lost 351 0.18
Jaymala Devi SS Lost 324 0.17
Arun Ray IND Lost 305 0.16
Paramhans Singh Urf Paramhans Kumar Singh AJPS Lost 223 0.11
Candidate Name Result Total Votes Vote %
Tejashwi Prasad Yadav RJD Won 91236 49.15
Satish Kumar BJP Lost 68503 36.90
Rakesh Raushan SP Lost 5220 2.81
Rizwanul Azam JDR Lost 4800 2.59
Rambabu Bhagat CPIMLL Lost 2538 1.37
Arun Ray IND Lost 2381 1.28
Om Prakash Singh IND Lost 1373 0.74
Suresh Yadav BSP Lost 1213 0.65
Rajesh Raushan AAHP Lost 992 0.53
Satish Kumar Singh IND Lost 962 0.52
Kumar Sameer Raja Yadav JAP(L) Lost 936 0.50
Ram Sawroop Ray NJPI Lost 843 0.45
Anil Singh SS Lost 709 0.38
Umesh Mahto SKLP Lost 642 0.35
Meghnath Paswan IND Lost 641 0.35
Govind Pandit PRP Lost 400 0.22
Akhilesh Kumar GAP Lost 378 0.20
Durga Devi KVD Lost 330 0.18
Param Hans Singh ABHM Lost 343 0.18
Yugeshwar Chaurasia RSMD Lost 285 0.15
.newsGridWrapper .desc { display: -webkit-box; -webkit-line-clamp: 3; -webkit-box-orient: vertical; overflow: hidden; text-overflow: ellipsis; }

{{ item.title }}

{{ item.summary }}

.rhsElectionNews_Wrapper .newsColumn figure{margin-bottom:.625rem;padding-bottom:.625rem;border-bottom:1px solid var(--story-border-color)} .rhsElectionNews_Wrapper .newsColumn figure:last-child{border-bottom:none;margin-bottom:0;padding-bottom:0} .rhsElectionNews_Wrapper .newsColumn figure a{display:grid;grid-template-columns:1fr 90px;gap:10px} .rhsElectionNews_Wrapper .newsColumn .imgThumb{order:2;position:relative;height:max-content} .rhsElectionNews_Wrapper .newsColumn .imgThumb img{width:100%;aspect-ratio:16/9;border-radius:4px;display:block} .rhsElectionNews_Wrapper .newsColumn .card_title .h3{font-size:.9375rem;line-height:1.25rem;font-weight:400;text-transform:capitalize;overflow:hidden;text-overflow:ellipsis;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-line-clamp:3;line-clamp:3;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;margin-bottom:0} .rhsElectionNews_Wrapper .videoPlayIcon svg{fill:transparent} .rhsElectionNews_Wrapper .newsColumn figure:first-child{border-bottom:none} .rhsElectionNews_Wrapper .newsColumn figure:first-child a{grid-template-columns:1fr} .rhsElectionNews_Wrapper .newsColumn figure:first-child .imgThumb{order:1} .rhsElectionNews_Wrapper .newsColumn figure:first-child .card_title{order:2} .rhsElectionNews_Wrapper .newsColumn figure:first-child .card_title .h3{font-size:1.125rem;font-weight:700;line-height:26px}

{{ articles_filter_4059_widget.title }}

.rhsElectionNews_Wrapper .newsColumn figure{margin-bottom:.625rem;padding-bottom:.625rem;border-bottom:1px solid var(--story-border-color)} .rhsElectionNews_Wrapper .newsColumn figure:last-child{border-bottom:none;margin-bottom:0;padding-bottom:0} .rhsElectionNews_Wrapper .newsColumn figure a{display:grid;grid-template-columns:1fr 90px;gap:10px} .rhsElectionNews_Wrapper .newsColumn .imgThumb{order:2;position:relative;height:max-content} .rhsElectionNews_Wrapper .newsColumn .imgThumb img{width:100%;aspect-ratio:16/9;border-radius:4px;display:block} .rhsElectionNews_Wrapper .newsColumn .card_title .h3{font-size:.9375rem;line-height:1.25rem;font-weight:400;text-transform:capitalize;overflow:hidden;text-overflow:ellipsis;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-line-clamp:3;line-clamp:3;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;margin-bottom:0} .rhsElectionNews_Wrapper .videoPlayIcon svg{fill:transparent} .rhsElectionNews_Wrapper .newsColumn figure:first-child{border-bottom:none} .rhsElectionNews_Wrapper .newsColumn figure:first-child a{grid-template-columns:1fr} .rhsElectionNews_Wrapper .newsColumn figure:first-child .imgThumb{order:1} .rhsElectionNews_Wrapper .newsColumn figure:first-child .card_title{order:2} .rhsElectionNews_Wrapper .newsColumn figure:first-child .card_title .h3{font-size:1.125rem;font-weight:700;line-height:26px}

{{ articles_filter_4060_widget.title }}