Sign In
By signing in or creating an account, you agree with Associated Broadcasting Company's Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.
By signing in or creating an account, you agree with Associated Broadcasting Company's Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.
New Delhi: Social media has a way of turning technical food safety issues into moments of public alarm, and the latest anxiety around eggs and nitrofuran residues is a case in point. Posts warning that eggs “contain cancer-causing antibiotics” have circulated widely, prompting some consumers to question whether a staple food has suddenly become unsafe. The science, however, does not support that conclusion.
Nitrofurans are a class of antibiotics that were once used in poultry and livestock to control bacterial infections. Regulators in India and several other countries later restricted the use of these substances in food-producing animals, largely as a precaution. The decision followed laboratory studies in which animals were exposed to very high doses of these drugs for extended periods. Under those conditions, researchers observed signs of potential carcinogenic effects. What often gets lost online is that these studies involved exposure levels far beyond anything detected in food.
Concern flared recently after testing identified trace amounts of AOZ, a nitrofuran metabolite, in a batch of eggs. While the compound itself is restricted, the quantity detected was below India’s permitted safety limit. Even so, the presence of a banned-abroad substance was enough to fuel alarming headlines and viral claims, many of which implied an immediate cancer risk from egg consumption.
Routine surveillance tells a calmer story. Food safety authorities regularly sample eggs and poultry products from markets, and compliance rates remain high. Data from nationwide testing in 2023 showed that more than 98% of poultry samples fell well within acceptable limits. When residues do appear, they are usually linked to small, poorly regulated operations rather than the organised supply chains that dominate urban markets.
The issue of dose is central, yet rarely mentioned in viral posts. The animal studies that raised red flags involved doses hundreds of times higher than the trace residues occasionally found in food. Even then, results varied by species and sex. In humans, the picture looks very different. Nitrofurantoin, a related drug, has been prescribed for decades to treat urinary tract infections, including during pregnancy when clinically necessary. Large epidemiological studies have not established a clear link between its use and cancer.
Public health experts stress that cancer risk does not arise from isolated, low-level exposures. The concern behind antibiotic bans is the cumulative exposure that can occur over time if drugs are misused repeatedly throughout the food chain. Claims that a single egg containing trace residues can “cause cancer” oversimplify both toxicology and disease biology. Cancer develops through a complex interaction of genetics, environment, and long-term exposures — not one meal.
Eggs remain among the most nutrient-dense foods available, providing high-quality protein, vitamin B12, choline, and essential fats. No health authority has advised people to avoid eggs because of cancer concerns. For most consumers, basic precautions are sufficient: buy from reputable sources, cook eggs thoroughly, and avoid concluding unverified online claims.
The real issue is not eggs on the plate, but enforcement at the farm level. Ensuring that banned antibiotics are not misused — and that withdrawal periods are respected — is what protects consumers. Panic does not.
