Sign In
By signing in or creating an account, you agree with Associated Broadcasting Company's Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.
By signing in or creating an account, you agree with Associated Broadcasting Company's Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Dehradun: After new land laws introduced in Uttarakhand, a home in hills may no longer be as accessible to outside homebuyers. The state government has enacted stringent changes to its land laws, limiting property purchases by non-residents in a bid to protect the state's cultural heritage, ecological balance, and regional identity.
Under the revised Bhu Kanoon, outsiders are barred from buying agricultural and horticultural land in 11 of the state’s 13 districts. Only Haridwar and Udham Singh Nagar remain open to such transactions, and even there, prior government approval is mandatory. Meanwhile, social media is abuzz with mixed reactions on this new step taken by the state government.
Outsiders cannot purchase more than 250 square meters for residential purpose
For residential land outside municipal limits, outsiders can purchase only once in their lifetime, and the plot must not exceed 250 square meters. Buyers must submit an affidavit confirming no prior transactions in the state. Commercial land purchases for schools, hotels, or hospitals are capped at 12.5 acres, with special permission required for anything beyond.
Another key provision mandates that land bought for any purpose must be developed within three years, failing which it will be vested in the government. District magistrates have been tasked with closely monitoring affidavit verifications and land use compliance.
Social media users have flagged potential loopholes
While the government insists the law is a step toward safeguarding Uttarakhand’s fragile ecology and cultural roots, social media users have flagged potential loopholes. Some pointed out that outsiders could still gain residential status by purchasing permissible land in Haridwar or Udham Singh Nagar, effectively bypassing restrictions.
Others argued that the real issue lies with locals who sell land indiscriminately or engage in unchecked construction. “It’s not outsiders alone—locals are also contributing to ecological damage,” one user commented.
Critics also questioned the practicality of the municipal boundary clause and raised concerns about the Uniform Civil Code’s implications on residency status. “This law will become a joke if enforcement is weak,” another user wrote. Still, many welcomed the move, calling it a long-overdue measure to curb land hoarding and preserve Uttarakhand’s character. “Finally, a great decision,” one account posted.
Debate has already ignited fresh conversations about land ownership
The full impact of the new regulations will unfold over time, but the debate has already ignited fresh conversations about land ownership, identity, and sustainable development in the hill state. Social media users are apprehensive about flaws and loopholes in the land laws and afraid of further misuse of laws to exploit the land and resources of this Himalayan state.
