TV9
user profile
Sign In

By signing in or creating an account, you agree with Associated Broadcasting Company's Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

India's Principled Foreign Policy: Distinguishing Engagement with Taliban and Dhaka

India maintains a consistent, principled foreign policy, differentiating its engagement with the Taliban in Afghanistan from its approach to Bangladesh. While India dialogues with the Taliban due to changed objectives, it rejects comparison with Dhaka, which is seen as having an "illegal, unconstitutional" regime.

| Updated on: Dec 23, 2025 | 08:20 AM

Indias foreign policy is guided by consistent principles rather than political convenience, especially when comparing its approach to Afghanistan under the Taliban and its relationship with Bangladesh. Experts highlight that Indias engagement with the Taliban (Taliban 2) is distinct from its past non-relations with Taliban 1.

This engagement is based on humanitarian projects and the Talibans recognition of Pakistan as a regional spoiler, a stark contrast to their previous close ties.

However, applying this model to Bangladesh is deemed inappropriate. The regime in Dhaka is characterised as "illegal and unconstitutional," unlike the Taliban, whose takeover was formalised by an agreement with the United States. Furthermore, India shares a substantial border with Bangladesh, necessitating a different strategic approach.

India views its support for Sheikh Hasina as consistent with its foreign policy principles, acknowledging her role in respecting Indias security interests and fostering economic cooperation.

Arguments suggest that relocating Sheikh Hasina could lead to international prosecution, making her continued presence in India a strategic asset rather than a liability, much like the case of the Dalai Lama.